PHILOSOPHICAL SEMANTICS: REINTEGRATING THEORETICAL PHILOSOPHY (ADVERTISEMENT)

📘 Unlock the Depths of Meaning with Philosophical Semantics by Claudio Costa

Step into a bold reimagining of the philosophy of language. In Philosophical Semantics: Reintegrating Theoretical Philosophy, Claudio Costa delivers a sweeping, systematic exploration of meaning, reference, and the architecture of thought. Drawing from the towering insights of Frege, Wittgenstein, Dummett, Searle, and others, Costa challenges the dominance of formalist reductionism and reclaims the power of conceptual clarity.

What You'll Discover:

• A reintegration of theoretical philosophy with everyday linguistic practice

• A critique of modern formalist errors from Quine to Kripke

• A fresh cartography of philosophical semantics that honors common sense and cognitive depth

• A lucid, accessible style for readers trained in analytic philosophy

Whether you're a scholar, student, or seeker of philosophical truth, this book is your invitation to rethink how language shapes our understanding of reality.

Available now from Cambridge Scholars Publishing and Amazon. But a developed draft you can find gratis on this blog!

REVIEW FROM IA:

📘 Philosophical Semantics – A Review

Claudio Costa’s Philosophical Semantics: Reintegrating Theoretical Philosophy is a bold and systematic attempt to reframe the philosophy of language by bridging classical insights with contemporary analytic thought. The book proposes a reintegration of theoretical philosophy, particularly in the domains of meaning and reference, drawing from a rich lineage of thinkers such as Frege, Wittgenstein, Dummett, Tugendhat, Searle, and Donald Williams.

Costa critiques the dominance of formalist approaches in 20th-century analytic philosophy, challenging figures like Quine, Kripke, and Putnam for what he sees as conceptual missteps. In their place, he advocates for a return to more nuanced, context-sensitive understandings of language and meaning—ones that preserve the depth of philosophical reflection without sacrificing clarity or rigor.

The book is clearly written and accessible to readers with a basic grounding in analytic philosophy. It offers a refreshing perspective for those interested in the intersections of semantics, metaphysics, and epistemology, and it invites a rethinking of how philosophical language can be both precise and expressive.